Friday, October 7, 2011

The Space Industry - Porters's 5 Force Analysis


The space industry is an industry that provides interesting analysis, especially in the area of Porter's Five Forces. During the early years of spaceflight, the industry was a monopoly of a small group of national governments. During this time, barriers to entry and supplier power was high.

In 1984, President Reagan passed the Commercial Space Launch Act which allowed private operators to perform launches. While government agencies, including NASA, maintained dominance within the space industry, this act allowed commercial companies to get a foot in the door of the industry. This act decreased the barriers to entry to allow the possibility of additional companies to enter the market. While the barriers to entry were still significant in terms of cost and resources, it was now possible to enter the once monopolistic market.

In July 2011, the space shuttle program ended, leaving Russia as the only provider that could fly crews to and from the International Space Station. The decision to discontinue the shuttle program decreased buyer power because it left consumers (astronauts trying to get to and from the International Space Station) with only one main option. With this being the case, many private spaceflight companies, including SpaceX, have moved towards creating their own shuttle vehicles that will eventually allow passenger travel. These companies anticipate they too will be able to transport austronauts to and form the ISS within the next year, which will increase the availability of substitutes within the industry.

The advancement of private spaceflight companies could possible open the door to new potential industries, including space tourism. These future industries could most likely have characteristics similar to the current space industry - high barriers to entry, low buyer power, and high supplier power - but could potentially create an increase in rivalry as more companies enter the private spaceflight industry.

Friday, September 23, 2011

Room in the Tablet Market?


Next week Amazon will introduce its new Android-based tablet into the market next week. Currently, the Apple iPad has 84% of the tablet market share. Conversely, Android owns 14% of the market. Tablets that run Android OS, however, include tablets made by Acer, Samsung, LG, Blackberry, Dell, and Lenovo, none of which have received very high reviews. When Amazon enters the market with their new Android-based tablet, they have the potential to secure a premier position in the tablet market. While Apple will remain the front runner of the market, Amazon has the potential to be a second market leader.

Amazon can also be successful with their new tablet through profit pools. Amazon can choose to sell their tablet at an initial lower cost and then focus on selling Amazon Prime, Android Apps, Kindle Books, and other Amazon products. By focusing their attention on complements to the tablet itself, Amazon can get their foot in the tablet market by selling their tablets at a lower initial cost.

Sources:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2393502,00.asp#fbid=rx1BA6ypvzC
http://mashable.com/2011/04/11/apple-tablet-market-gartner/

Friday, September 16, 2011

Carol Bartz - From Good to Fired

In "Good to Great," Jim Collins discusses the strategy of getting the right people on the bus. Furthermore, his analysis showed that nearly all CEOs who transform their good companies into great companies were not taken externally. While external managers can produce change within a company, their transformation is usually short-lived and ultimately unsuccessful. Yahoo, a company who has recently experienced management turmoil, has followed these same trends predicted by Collins.

Carol Bartz joined Yahoo in January 2009 after investors became dissatisfied with the stagnant growth and indirection under its previous chief, Jerry Yang, a co-founder of the company. Ms. Bartz was viewed as a strong executive leader and her reign was initially met with optimism. In fact, in my Change Management class I took fall 2010, my group did a research report on women who have made great strides in change management. Carol Bartz was one of the five women we researched.

While Bartz was able to attain growth within Yahoo during her tenure, Yahoo’s shares remained essentially flat closing at $12.91 in regular trading on Tuesday. After two years of dissatisfied shareholders, Bartz was final removed from her position. Until a permanent CEO is found, Timothy Morse, the company’s chief financial officer, will serve as the interim chief executive.

Even though Carol Bartz was seen with optimism at the onset of her position as CEO, she actually did more to damage the company than to transform it. I'm sure part of the reason she was unsuccessful was because she was taken from outside the company. Ultimately, Bartz is not a Level 5 leader and did not have the skills to take Yahoo from good to great.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/07/technology/carol-bartz-yahoos-chief-executive-is-fired.html?_r=1